Skip to content

Conversation

@Glide-Cait
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

  • Creates glide/skills/explain-feature/SKILL.md to make the command invokable via the Skill tool
  • Updates README to document the new skill in the Skills table
  • Enables all plugin users to invoke /explain-feature programmatically

Context

The /explain-feature command was previously only available in glide/commands/ as documentation. This PR makes it a proper skill that Claude Code can invoke via the Skill tool.

Changes

  • Created glide/skills/explain-feature/SKILL.md (copied from command file)
  • Added explain-feature entry to Skills table in README
  • Maintained existing command file for reference

Testing

After merge, users should be able to invoke the skill and receive progressive, educational explanations of Glide features.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Cait Levin and others added 2 commits January 15, 2026 13:17
This new command provides clear, digestible explanations of Glide features
using progressive disclosure. Instead of overwhelming users with information,
it starts with a brief "What It Is" and "Core Concept", then lets users
request specific details like examples, setup instructions, common mistakes,
business use cases, limitations, or related features.

Key features:
- Progressive disclosure: starts minimal, expands on demand
- Professional tone without being condescending
- Business-focused examples
- User-driven depth control
- Clear explanations of complex features

Usage examples:
/explain-feature rollups
/explain-feature math columns
/explain-feature workflows

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Create glide/skills/explain-feature/SKILL.md from command file
- Add explain-feature to Skills table in README
- Enables invocation via Skill tool for all plugin users

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@glidesuccess glidesuccess merged commit ea2f200 into main Jan 28, 2026
@glidesuccess glidesuccess deleted the add-explain-feature-command branch January 28, 2026 10:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants